Edison Ambarzumjan vs Eliakim Coulibaly Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ambarzumjan vs Coulibaly analysis and find out who is favored!
Edison Ambarzumjan vs Eliakim Coulibaly Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ambarzumjan 1 - 0 Coulibaly
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ambarzumjan has won 49.34% of points on their second serve, while Coulibaly has won 48.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ambarzumjan, in recent form, has won 51.47% of their opponent's second serve points, while Coulibaly has won 53.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.24% and 37.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ambarzumjan has saved 66.09% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Coulibaly has saved 64.6% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ambarzumjan has won 56.76% of matches played (W/L 21/ 16), with Coulibaly winning 59.02% (W/L 36/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ambarzumjan has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8). Coulibaly has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 111/ 48), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Ambarzumjan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.76% of matches (W/L 21/ 16), where as Coulibaly has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.58% of matches (W/L 31/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ambarzumjan winning 1 times and Coulibaly being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ambarzumjan winning 2 and Coulibaly winning 0. The last match between Ambarzumjan and Coulibaly was at the M15 Addis Ababa, 17-05-2024, Quarterfinals, Clay with Edison Ambarzumjan getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ambarzumjan and Coulibaly have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ambarzumjan winning 0 times and Coulibaly 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ambarzumjan winning 1, and Coulibaly 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ambarzumjan has played against opponents with an average rank of 60.81 while Coulibaly has played against players with an average rank of 135.18.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ambarzumjan has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Coulibaly has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ambarzumjan has converted 40.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Coulibaly has converted 45.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
561
Rank
378
High
22
Age
Plays
6
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
Form
52% (44-41)
Career Total W/L
66% (132-67)
62% (16-10)
YTD W/L
65% (22-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ambarzumjan VS Coulibaly H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Edison Ambarzumjan | Eliakim Coulibaly |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 6 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:47:0 | 1:47:0 |
1st Serve % | 59% (45/76) | 64% (48/75) |
1st Serve Win% | 82% (37/45) | 67% (32/48) |
2nd Serve Win% | 42% (13/31) | 52% (14/27) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 20% (1/5) |
Return Points W% | 39% (29/75) | 34% (26/76) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Ambarzumjan VS Coulibaly H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(5) 6-4 |
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Edison Ambarzumjan | Eliakim Coulibaly |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 62% (16/10) | 65% (22/12) |
Sets Win/Loss | 63% (36/21) | 65% (44/24) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (316/276) | 58% (357/263) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (12/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 62% (13/8) | 71% (5/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 63% (5/3) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.53 |
Aces Total | 59 | 160 |
DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.4 |
DFs Total | 36 | 119 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:26:45 |
Avg Opp Rank | 53.08 | 57.68 |
1st Serve % | 57% (601/1059) | 65% (1214/1855) |
1st Serve W% | 71% (425/601) | 73% (889/1214) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (226/458) | 48% (308/641) |
BPs Won% Total | 40% (36/89) | 46% (103/224) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (394/1041) | 43% (841/1958) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
Futures W/L | 62% (16/10) | 67% (20/10) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (16/26) | 67% (22/33) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 56% (5/9) |
Deciding Set W% | 20% (1/5) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 80% (20/16) | 100% (22/22) |
1st set W, L | 20% (20/4) | 0% (22/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (12/0) |
Edison Ambarzumjan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Maik Steiner
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
68%
(
76 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
69 of
124)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
33 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
124)
126
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(7) 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Sina Moghimi
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Aaron Gil Garcia
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
SF |
Luca Fantini
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Rafael Ymer
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Pablo Trochu
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Unknown Player
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
112)
1
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
112)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(2) 7-6(3) 16-14 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Eliakim Coulibaly Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Philip Henning
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
3
Aces
20
1
Double Faults
6
86%
(
42 of
49)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
42 of
49)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
13 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Adil Kalyanpur
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
85%
(
47 of
55)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Kazuma Kawachi
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Abdella Nedim Mohammed
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Dev Javia
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
56 of
85)
11
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Giuseppe Tresca
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Pablo Trochu
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Aleksandr Lobanov
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Ambarzumjan Vs Coulibaly Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ambarzumjan are available here and Coulibaly photos here.